National HIV CurriculumLogo

Lesson 2. Adverse Effects of Antiretroviral Medications

PDF Share
Last Updated: May 19th, 2026
Author:
Brian R. Wood, MD
Brian R. Wood, MD
Professor of Medicine
Division of Allergy & Infectious Diseases
University of Washington
Disclosures: None
Reviewer:
David H. Spach, MD
David H. Spach, MD
Professor of Medicine
Division of Allergy & Infectious Diseases
University of Washington
Disclosures: None

Learning Objective Performance Indicators

  • Summarize common adverse effects associated with antiretroviral medications
  • Identify serious adverse effects caused by antiretroviral therapy
  • List appropriate baseline laboratory studies to perform when starting antiretroviral therapy
  • Discuss frequency of types of laboratory tests for monitoring persons taking antiretroviral therapy
  • Explain management strategies for antiretroviral-related adverse effects

Background

Antiretroviral therapy has transformed HIV into a manageable chronic disease, but antiretroviral medications have the potential to cause short-term and long-term adverse effects. Medication-related adverse effects may manifest as overt symptoms or initially only as laboratory abnormalities.[1] The spectrum of potential antiretroviral drug toxicity is broad, including renal toxicity, effects on bone mineralization, metabolic effects, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular effects, hypersensitivity, skin reactions, liver injury, insomnia, and neuropsychiatric manifestations.[2] In general, newer recommended antiretroviral medications have a markedly improved safety profile compared with older antiretroviral medications.[3] Clinicians who provide care to persons with HIV should have an understanding of the basic toxicity profile of antiretroviral medications and knowledge of recommended monitoring strategies, keeping in mind that most individuals tolerate antiretroviral medications well and experience only mild or no side effects. This Topic Review will explore antiretroviral-associated adverse effects by medication class and by specific medication. Issues related to drug interactions with antiretroviral medications are addressed in this same module in the lesson on Drug Interactions with Antiretroviral Therapy.

Laboratory Monitoring in Adults Taking Antiretroviral Therapy

All persons with HIV who initiate antiretroviral therapy should have laboratory studies performed at the initial visit, before initiating or changing a regimen, and as regular monitoring for long-term safety once a regimen is initiated. If abacavir or any abacavir fixed-dose combination is used in the regimen, baseline HLA-B*5701 testing should be performed. The table below summarizes key baseline and safety laboratory studies recommended for individuals taking antiretroviral therapy.[4] 

Table 1. Laboratory Monitoring in Adults with HIV Taking Antiretroviral Therapy*
Laboratory Study ART Initiation 4-8 Weeks after ART Initiation or Modification Every
3 Months		 Every
6 Months		 Every
12 Months		 Clinically Indicated
HLA-B*5701 √
If considering abacavir		          
Basic metabolic panela,b √ √   √   √
ALT, AST, total bilirubin √ √   √   √
CBC with differentialc √   √
When monitoring CD4 count		 √
When monitoring CD4 count		 √
When no longer monitoring CD4 count 		 √
Lipid profiled √ Consider 1–3 months after ARV initiation or modification     √
If normal at baseline but with CV risk		 If normal at baseline, every 5 years or if clinically indicated
Random or fasting glucosee √         √
Urinalysisf,g √       √
​If on tenofovir DF or tenofovir alafenamide

√

E.g., in patients with chronic kidney disease or diabetes mellitus
Pregnancy testh √         √

*The information contained in this table is based on information in the table Laboratory Testing for Initial Assessment and Monitoring of People with HIV Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy.
aSerum Na, K, HCO3, Cl, BUN, creatinine, glucose, and Cr-based eGFR. Serum P should be monitored in patients with CKD who are on TDF-containing regimens.
bMore frequent monitoring may be indicated for patients with evidence of kidney disease (e.g., proteinuria, decreased glomerular dysfunction) or increased risk of renal insufficiency (e.g., patients with diabetes, hypertension).
cCBC with differential should be done when a CD4 count is performed. When CD4 count is no longer being monitored, the recommended frequency of CBC with differential is once a year. More frequent monitoring may be indicated for people receiving medications that potentially cause cytopenia (e.g., TMP-SMX).
dIf random lipids are abnormal, fasting lipids should be obtained. Consult the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association’s 2018 Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol for diagnosis and management of patients with dyslipidemia.
eIf random glucose is abnormal, fasting glucose should be obtained. HbA1C is no longer recommended for diagnosis of diabetes in people with HIV on ART.
fConsult the HIVMA/IDSA’s Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients Infected with HIV for recommendations on managing patients with renal disease. More frequent monitoring may be indicated for patients with evidence of kidney disease (e.g., proteinuria, decreased glomerular dysfunction) or increased risk of renal insufficiency (e.g., patients with diabetes, hypertension).
gUrine glucose and protein should be assessed before initiating tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)- or tenofovir DF (TDF)-containing regimens and monitored during treatment with these regimens.
hFor women of childbearing potential.
Source:
  • Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Laboratory testing: laboratory testing for initial assessment and monitoring of people with HIV. September 25, 2025. [HIV.gov]

Entry Inhibitors

Fostemsavir

Fostemsavir is the only attachment inhibitor approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and it is primarily used in heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV.[5] Fostemsavir is an oral medication that, after ingestion, is hydrolyzed to the active drug—temsavir.[5] In the only phase 3 trial completed with fostemsavir, serious side effects were rare; the most commonly observed mild-moderate side effects were nausea and diarrhea.[6] Fostemsavir was shown to significantly prolong the QTc interval when given at a dose of 2,400 mg twice daily, which is 4 times the recommended daily dose.[7] Caution is thus advised if using fostemsavir in patients with a history of QTc prolongation, torsades de pointes, or if taking other medications known to prolong the QT interval.

Ibalizumab

Ibalizumab is a post-attachment entry inhibitor that is a humanized monoclonal IgG-4 antibody that prevents HIV cell entry by binding to the host CD4 receptor. Ibalizumab requires intravenous infusion and is dosed every 2 weeks. In clinical trials, the most common adverse effects associated with ibalizumab have been diarrhea, dizziness, nausea, and rash.[8] Infusion reactions may also occur. Although ibalizumab binds directly to a host cell receptor, there are no known adverse immunologic effects of this medication.

Maraviroc

Maraviroc is an entry inhibitor that exerts its action by directly binding to a host protein—the CCR5 coreceptor. In clinical practice and in clinical trials, maraviroc has been well tolerated, and serious toxicity has been quite rare.[9,10] Maraviroc has been linked to very rare cases of severe rash with systemic symptoms. In addition, there are rare cases of hepatotoxicity, which may be preceded by severe rash and allergic symptoms in patients taking maraviroc.[11,12] Since maraviroc binds directly to a host (human) CCR5 coreceptor, this initially raised concerns about potential maraviroc-induced problems with host immune function or cancer surveillance. Clinical trial data and clinical experience have not shown an excess of infections or malignancies, with the exception that maraviroc may increase the risk of developing symptomatic West Nile virus infection.[9,13,14]

Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors

In general, integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are well tolerated and cause minimal drug interactions. In clinical trials, the most frequently reported adverse effects were headache, nausea, diarrhea, insomnia, and fatigue; these side effects, however, were typically mild and not severe enough to warrant stopping therapy.[1] Rare cases of mood changes or new onset of psychiatric disorders have been observed with INSTIs.[2,15,16]

Adverse Effects Observed with Bictegravir and Dolutegravir

Weight Gain

Several studies have concluded that INSTIs, particularly dolutegravir, lead to greater weight gain than other classes of antiretrovirals; dolutegravir-associated weight gain appears to be more pronounced when dolutegravir is combined with tenofovir alafenamide than with tenofovir DF (Figure 1).[17,18,19,20] Available data also suggest weight gain is relatively greater in persons taking bictegravir-tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine than in persons taking antiretroviral therapy with other anchor drugs, such as boosted elvitegravir, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, or a boosted protease inhibitor.[21] Observations of excess weight gain after a switch to dolutegravir (or bictegravir), with or without a switch to tenofovir alafenamide, are complicated because studies also find associations between older antiretroviral agents (such as efavirenz and tenofovir DF) and suppression of weight gain, so removal of these agents likely plays a role in post-switch weight change. The mechanism and clinical significance are unclear. A randomized trial that enrolled individuals with an elevated body mass index (BMI) and randomized them to either (1) continue an INSTI plus tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine, (2) switch the INSTI to doravirine (an NNRTI) and continue tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine, or (3) switch the INSTI to doravirine and switch tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine to tenofovir DF-emtricitabine, did not find any difference in weight change between the three arms after 48 weeks of follow up.[22] To date, guidelines do not recommend altering the choice of initial antiretroviral therapy due to the potential for weight gain and guidelines specify that it remains unclear whether switching from an INSTI to an alternate anchor drug leads to reversal of weight gain.[2]

Elevated Serum Creatinine

Dolutegravir and bictegravir cause a predictable, modest, benign increase in serum creatinine, and thereby, a decrease in estimated creatinine clearance due to inhibition of active tubular secretion of creatinine via blockade of the organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) (Figure 2).[23] In the kidney, OCT2 is an uptake transporter located on the basolateral (blood) membrane of renal proximal tubular cells, and it plays a role in transporting creatinine from the peritubular capillary blood cells into the renal tubular cells (tubular secretion of creatinine). Normally, approximately 15% of creatinine is secreted into the urine in the proximal tubule. Inhibition of OCT2 by dolutegravir causes more creatinine to remain in the bloodstream and an increase in serum creatinine. Iohexol clearance studies have shown that dolutegravir-related changes in serum creatinine do not reflect a reduction in true renal glomerular function.[24,25] These changes in serum creatinine caused by dolutegravir and bictegravir are usually small, occur in the first 2 to 3 months after starting the medication, and then plateau. Continued increases in serum creatinine after 2 to 3 months or an increase significantly greater than 0.2 mg/dL should prompt evaluation for a source of elevated creatinine other than bictegravir or dolutegravir.

Bictegravir

Bictegravir is an INSTI that is available only as a single-tablet regimen—bictegravir-tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine. In clinical trials, the most common adverse effects associated with bictegravir-tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine were diarrhea, nausea, and headache.[26,27,28] There are no known serious adverse effects associated with bictegravir. Available studies suggest the increases in serum creatinine associated with bictegravir are slightly less than with dolutegravir the increases are benign.[27,29]

Cabotegravir

For HIV treatment, cabotegravir is available as a long-acting injectable combination of cabotegravir and rilpivirine. For HIV preexposure prophylaxis, long-acting injectable cabotegravir alone can be used. Oral cabotegravir can be used as a lead-in for approximately 1 month. The major adverse effects attributed to long-acting injectable cabotegravir are injection site reactions, including pain, nodules, induration, and swelling.[30,31,32] The injection site reactions typically become less frequent over time while receiving long-acting injectable cabotegravir.[31]

Dolutegravir

Overall, dolutegravir is well tolerated and infrequently causes adverse effects. Dolutegravir is widely prescribed for treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced individuals.

  • Insomnia: In randomized trial settings, the incidence of insomnia in patients taking dolutegravir ranged from 3 to 15%.[33,34] Clinical experience has shown that some patients develop insomnia while taking dolutegravir, but this rarely requires discontinuation of dolutegravir.
  • Headache: In clinical trials, aside from insomnia, headache was the most common side effect of moderate to severe intensity that occurred, though it was still uncommon (2% of participants in one of the phase 3 clinical trials).[34] In practice, it is a rare cause of intolerability of dolutegravir.
  • Elevated Serum Creatinine: The dolutegravir-associated elevations in serum creatinine are typically in the range of 0.1 to 0.2 mg/dL (mean change 0.15 mg/dL), occur within 4 weeks after starting dolutegravir, and remain stable thereafter (Figure 3).[34,35]

Elvitegravir

Elvitegravir is an INSTI that is available as a component of two single-tablet regimens: elvitegravir-cobicistat-tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine and elvitegravir-cobicistat-tenofovir DF-emtricitabine. Although elvitegravir itself causes few adverse effects, the cobicistat that it is combined with may lead to significant gastrointestinal symptoms and cause benign mild elevations in serum creatinine levels.[36,37] Elvitegravir-based regimens are infrequently used now. Compared with boosted elvitegravir, dolutegravir or bictegravir are usually better tolerated and have fewer drug interactions.

Raltegravir

Raltegravir is generally well-tolerated and has the fewest drug interactions among medications in the INSTI class. In current clinical practice, dolutegravir or bictegravir are usually favored over raltegravir, because raltegravir has a lower barrier to resistance and higher pill burden. Most individuals tolerate raltegravir well. The potential toxicities listed below have been reported, but rarely occur in clinical practice.

  • Elevated Creatine Kinase: Raltegravir has been reported to cause elevated creatine kinase enzyme levels in some patients and, in some cases, has been associated with rhabdomyolysis and myositis.[38,39] Concurrent use of a statin medication, which can also cause elevations in creatine kinase, likely increases this risk.[39]
  • Proximal Myopathy: Raltegravir has been reported to cause myalgias and proximal myopathy in the setting of normal creatine kinase levels, but the mechanism is unclear, and there is no evidence to suggest that raltegravir causes polymyositis or dermatomyositis.[39]
  • Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Rash and severe systemic hypersensitivity reactions have rarely been reported in patients taking a regimen that included raltegravir.[40,41,42]

Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Adverse Effects Observed with More than 1 NRTI

Mitochondrial Toxicity

Several of the older nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)—didanosine, stavudine, and zidovudine—can cause mitochondrial adverse effects; these effects rarely occur with abacavir, emtricitabine, lamivudine, tenofovir alafenamide, or tenofovir DF. Mitochondrial toxicity caused by the NRTIs can result in a wide range of adverse effects, including lactic acidosis, hepatic steatosis, myopathy, cardiomyopathy, peripheral neuropathy, pancreatitis, lipoatrophy, and possibly lipodystrophy syndrome.[43,44,45,46] Since didanosine, stavudine, and zidovudine are rarely used in current clinical practice (and manufacturing of didanosine and stavudine has been discontinued), these adverse effects will not be reviewed in further detail. If NRTI-related peripheral neuropathy and/or lipoatrophy develops, it usually only partially reverses or does not reverse at all, when discontinuing the offending medication.[43]

Hyperlipidemia

The effect of NRTIs on metabolic parameters, in particular lipid levels, are heterogeneous, and study findings have been conflicting. Didanosine, stavudine, and zidovudine typically produce unfavorable changes in lipid levels, whereas tenofovir DF usually produces favorable lipid effects; abacavir, emtricitabine, lamivudine, and tenofovir alafenamide have relatively neutral effects on lipids.[47,48] The mechanism for adverse lipid effects associated with didanosine, stavudine, and zidovudine has not been well-defined, but switching from zidovudine or stavudine to a more lipid-friendly NRTI can improve lipid profiles.[49,50] Switching from tenofovir DF to tenofovir alafenamide, which is often done in clinical practice, may lead to a slight rise in all serum lipid parameters; the cause of the increase in lipids is at least partly due to the removal of the mild lipid-lowering effects of tenofovir DF and the long-term clinical consequences have not been confirmed.

Abacavir

Abacavir is an NRTI that is also available in the fixed-dose combination drugs abacavir-lamivudine and dolutegravir-abacavir-lamivudine. Formerly, abacavir was available in a fixed-dose combination of abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine, but manufacturing of that combination was discontinued. Abacavir in any form should only be used in persons who have a negative HLA-B*5701 screening test.[3]

  • Cardiovascular Risk: Abacavir has been associated with cardiovascular disease in some studies, but the data on this issue are conflicting.[51,52,53,54] In the Strategies for the Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) trial, a sub-analysis found that patients taking abacavir had a higher rate of cardiovascular disease than persons taking other NRTIs.[51] The Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti-HIV Drugs (D:A:D) cohort study also found an elevated risk of myocardial infarction in persons taking abacavir.[55,56] In contrast, a meta-analysis that included data from more than 9,000 persons with HIV in randomized controlled trials concluded abacavir does not confer a higher risk of cardiovascular events relative to comparator abacavir-sparing regimens.[54] In light of these concerning but conflicting findings, most experts recommend avoiding abacavir in persons with cardiovascular disease (or significant risk factors for cardiovascular disease). The mechanism by which abacavir may increase the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events has been proposed to relate to platelet activation and aggregation.[57,58,59]
  • Hypersensitivity Reaction: The abacavir hypersensitivity reaction is a potentially life-threatening reaction to abacavir that occurs in up to 5% of individuals who do not undergo HLA-B*5701 screening; this reaction is highly associated with positivity for the HLA-B*5701 allele, which stimulates a self-directed immune response .[60,61] Signs and symptoms of abacavir hypersensitivity typically develop within 6 weeks of starting abacavir and include fever, rash, malaise, gastrointestinal effects, and respiratory symptoms.[61,62] The HLA-B*5701 test is highly useful for identifying persons who have a significantly increased risk of developing abacavir hypersensitivity. Screening for HLA-B*5701 is required before prescribing abacavir, and any person with a positive HLA-B*5701 screening test should not receive abacavir.[3,4]
    Table 2. Allele Frequency of HLA-B*5701 in Various Population Groups
    Population Group HLA-B*5701 Carrier Frequency Range (%)
    European  1.4 – 10.2
    South American 1.1– 3.1
    African 0.0 – 3.2
    Middle Eastern 0.5– 6.0
    Mexican 0.0 – 4.0
    Asian 0.0 – 6.7
    Southwest Asian (Indian) 3.8 – 19.6
    Source:
    • Martin MA, Kroetz DL. Abacavir pharmacogenetics--from initial reports to standard of care. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33:765-75. [PubMed Abstract]

Emtricitabine and Lamivudine

Emtricitabine and lamivudine have the best tolerability and safety profile among all the NRTIs.[63,64,65] In clinical trials, discoloration of the skin, nails, and tongue was the only side effect that was more common among people taking emtricitabine compared with other antiretroviral medications, though these effects seem to be rare in clinical practice.[66]

Islatravir

Islatavir is available in combination with doravirine as a fixed-dose combination.[67] Islatravir, when used at a dose of 0.25 mg in combination with doravirine, has been well tolerated in clinical trials.[68,69,70] The most commonly observed adverse events have included headache, nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, and dizziness, though these were generally mild and rarely led to discontinuation of the medication.[68,69,70] In earlier studies of islatravir-containing regimens, islatravir at a dose of 0.75 mg daily or higher caused decreases in total lymphocyte and absolute CD4 cell counts.[67] In later trials, however, which have used a lower 0.25 mg daily dose of islatravir, did not find any safety concern related to lymphocyte or CD4 counts. The lower 0.25 mg dose is used in the FDA-approved fixed-dose combination doravirine-islatravir.

Tenofovir alafenamide

Tenofovir alafenamide is available as a component of multiple fixed-dose combination tablets. When compared with tenofovir DF, tenofovir alafenamide generates significantly lower serum tenofovir levels, which may offer a relatively better renal and bone safety profile (Figure 4).[71,72,73,74] Switching from tenofovir DF to tenofovir alafenamide results in improved glomerular filtration rate, glomerular and tubular proteinuria, and bone mineral density.[75,76] Overall, in clinical trials, tenofovir alafenamide was well tolerated, except for mild gastrointestinal effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea). Increases in certain lipid parameters (total cholesterol and HDL) are more likely to occur with tenofovir alafenamide than with tenofovir DF.[74,77] Some clinical trials and retrospective data suggest that use of tenofovir alafenamide leads to more weight gain than the use of tenofovir DF, but the mechanism and clinical significance are not known.[19,78]

  • Renal Monitoring on Tenofovir alafenamide: Persons receiving tenofovir alafenamide should have serum creatinine obtained at baseline, 4-8 weeks after starting therapy, and every 6 months thereafter.[4] Tenofovir alafenamide is not recommended in persons who have an estimated creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min. Urine glucose and protein should be obtained at baseline and repeated at least annually.[4]

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Tenofovir DF)

Tenofovir DF is available as a single drug and in multiple fixed-dose combinations. Several studies have shown that persons receiving tenofovir DF had improved lipid profiles when compared with persons receiving abacavir or tenofovir alafenamide.[36,79] The main adverse effects associated with tenofovir DF are decreases in bone mineral density and renal toxicity.[74,80] Tenofovir DF may also suppress weight gain or induce weight loss, though the mechanism has not been confirmed, and further research into this observational finding is needed.[81]

  • Bone Demineralization: Multiple studies have specifically implicated tenofovir DF use as a risk factor for reduced bone mineral density.[36,74,82] Although the mechanism for this effect is incompletely understood, tenofovir DF may affect bone indirectly through proximal tubular toxicity, leading to phosphate wasting and bone turnover.[83] There is also evidence that tenofovir DF may affect bone turnover through effects on parathyroid hormone levels or by direct effects on osteoclasts or osteoblasts.[84,85] There are no specific recommendations for bone mineral density screening for individuals taking tenofovir DF, but use of tenofovir DF should be considered a risk factor for osteopenia and osteoporosis.
  • Nephrotoxicity: Tenofovir DF-associated renal toxicity may include gradual declines in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), phosphate wasting, proteinuria, glycosuria, and Fanconi syndrome (generalized proximal tubule dysfunction manifesting as type 2 renal tubular acidosis and phosphate wasting).[25] According to the FDA package insert, the dosing frequency of tenofovir DF can be reduced if the creatinine clearance falls to below 50 mL/min, but most clinicians would instead choose an alternate antiretroviral agent in this setting (both to reduce the risk of inducing further renal insufficiency and because the recommended dosing of tenofovir DF in this situation may be difficult to adhere to, such as dosing every 48 or every 72 to 96 hours). For persons taking HIV PrEP, tenofovir DF is not recommended if the creatinine clearance is less than 60 mL/min.
  • Risk Factors for Nephrotoxicity: Risk factors for tenofovir DF-associated nephrotoxicity include low CD4 cell count, hepatitis C coinfection, diabetes, older age, and baseline hepatic or renal dysfunction.[86,87] Some studies have shown that the risk of nephrotoxicity also increases when tenofovir DF is used with a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor or with unboosted atazanavir (when compared with tenofovir DF plus a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor); other studies, however, have shown that use of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors and unboosted atazanavir independently predicts chronic kidney disease to a similar degree as use of tenofovir DF. Concomitant use of nephrotoxic, non-antiretroviral medications may also increase the risk of tenofovir DF-associated renal adverse effects.
  • Monitoring for Tenofovir DF-Associated Nephrotoxicity: The 2014 HIVMA CKD Clinical Practice Guideline recommends routine monitoring of kidney function in order to allow timely identification of tenofovir DF-related nephrotoxicity.[25] Additional available guidelines for monitoring patients for renal dysfunction are in the Adult and Adolescent ARV Guidelines.[4] More frequent monitoring may be indicated in certain clinical situations, including the presence of risk factors for renal disease. The following summarizes the recommendations from these guidelines:
    • Monitoring serum creatinine and GFR should be performed at baseline, 4 to 8 weeks after starting therapy, and every 6 months thereafter. More frequent monitoring may be indicated in persons with chronic kidney disease risk factors.
    • Urinalysis (including urine glucose and protein) should be performed at baseline when starting tenofovir-DF and monitored at least annually.
    • If the urinalysis is performed and shows proteinuria of 1+ or higher, then a quantitative follow-up test is indicated, either an albumin-to-creatinine ratio or a protein-to-creatinine ratio.
    • Check serum phosphate every 6 to 12 months, since hypophosphatemia can be a sign of tenofovir Df-induced proximal tubulopathy.
  • Evaluation of Suspected Tenofovir DF-Associated Nephrotoxicity: For persons with HIV who develop renal dysfunction in the setting of tenofovir DF use, it can be challenging to determine whether tenofovir DF is the cause of the renal dysfunction. Measuring markers of proximal tubular dysfunction may be helpful in this scenario since these markers can distinguish proximal tubular disease (most likely, tenofovir-induced) from glomerular disease (Figure 5).[25] Two indicators have high specificity as markers for tubular dysfunction: (1) glycosuria with normal serum glucose and (2) urinary phosphorus wasting with low serum phosphorus.
    • Fractional Excretion of Phosphate: Phosphorus wasting can be determined by calculating the fractional excretion of phosphate. Normal fractional excretion of phosphate is generally defined as less than 10%, and impaired fractional excretion of phosphate is defined as above 20%; thus, a fractional excretion of phosphate above 20% raises the likelihood of tenofovir DF-related toxicity, whereas a result below 10% makes tenofovir DF toxicity unlikely.[25] A result between 10 and 20% is considered indeterminate. The fractional excretion of phosphate can be determined with a Fractional Excretion of Phosphate (FePO4) calculator, and it requires a serum phosphate, urine phosphate, serum creatinine, and urine creatinine (see the FePO4 Calculator in the Tools and Calculators section of this website).
    • Proteinuria: Although proteinuria is not specific to proximal tubular dysfunction, it should also be included in the workup. New onset or worsening proteinuria may be evidence of tenofovir DF-induced proximal tubular wasting (if there is no alternate explanation and if other results suggest proximal tubulopathy) and should prompt additional evaluation for tenofovir DF renal toxicity. New or worsening proteinuria may indicate a need to discontinue tenofovir DF, particularly if associated with a decline in renal function. Tests that quantify proteinuria are useful in this scenario, and a urine albumin-to-protein ratio of less than 0.4 may be useful in distinguishing proteinuria due to proximal tubular dysfunction (secondary to tenofovir DF toxicity) from proteinuria due to glomerular disease.[25] New or worsening proteinuria may indicate a need to change tenofovir DF, particularly if associated with a decline in renal function.
  • Discontinuing or Switching Tenofovir DF because of Nephrotoxicity: Continuing tenofovir DF in the setting of ongoing renal dysfunction, particularly if the dose is not reduced when indicated, can result in severe renal failure. The 2014 HIVMA CKD Clinical Practice Guideline recommends discontinuing tenofovir DF in patients who have a significant reduction in GFR (greater than 25% decrease from baseline and to a level less than 60 mL/minute/1.73 m2), particularly when additional evaluation shows evidence of proximal tubular dysfunction (new onset or worsening of proteinuria, increased urinary phosphorous excretion and hypophosphatemia, euglycemic glycosuria, or increased urinary phosphorous excretion and hypophosphatemia).[25] In clinical practice, if tenofovir DF appears to be inducing renal adverse effects, one may consider switching it to an alternate agent or changing the regimen to one that avoids NRTIs altogether or avoids both tenofovir DF and tenofovir alafenamide. In this setting, if tenofovir DF is stopped, the renal dysfunction tends to improve over time, but sometimes improvement is slow and in rare cases the renal toxicity effects persist.[88]

Zidovudine

In the current antiretroviral era, zidovudine is rarely used, primarily because of poor tolerance and substantial risk of long-term adverse effects. An array of adverse effects have been associated with zidovudine use, including fatigue, headache, gastrointestinal upset, lipoatrophy, bone marrow suppression, and myopathy.[89,90] In most circumstances, a person taking zidovudine should have their antiretroviral regimen updated to a new regimen that does not include zidovudine.

Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

There are four non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) currently in use: doravirine, efavirenz, etravirine, and rilpivirine.[3] Delavirdine and nevirapine are no longer manufactured in the United States and will not be discussed further.

Doravirine

Doravirine is an NNRTI that is very well tolerated and has been associated with very few adverse effects.[91,92] In clinical trials, doravirine, when compared with efavirenz, had fewer cutaneous and neuropsychiatric adverse effects.[93] Approximately 1% of individuals discontinued doravirine because of neuropsychiatric adverse effects. Compared with ritonavir-boosted darunavir or efavirenz, doravirine clearly had a favorable lipid profile.[93]

Efavirenz

Efavirenz is a highly potent NNRTI, but it is no longer recommended as a component of preferred antiretroviral regimens, primarily due to neuropsychiatric adverse effects. Efavirenz is predominantly eliminated by the cytochrome p450 enzyme CYP2B6 and persons with the CYP2B6*6 allele have reduced clearance of efavirenz and thus greater risk for efavirenz-related toxicity. Due to the neuropsychiatric risks and other side effects described below, clinicians should choose other options than efavirenz for starting antiretroviral therapy and should have a low threshold to recommend a change of efavirenz to a newer, safer option for individuals still taking this agent.

  • Cardiac QTc Interval Prolongation: Prolonged QTc intervals have been reported with the administration of efavirenz and one study has shown that persons homozygous for CYP2B6*6 have an increased risk for developing efavirenz-induced prolongation of QTc.[94,95] This issue is particularly important when patients are taking medications other than efavirenz that may cause QT prolongation.
  • Dyslipidemia: Efavirenz has also been shown to increase lipid parameters.[50,96] It is unclear, though, what impact efavirenz-induced dyslipidemia has on cardiovascular disease risk, especially given that HDL levels increase with efavirenz, and these HDL changes may potentially confer a protective effect.[97,98]
  • Hepatotoxicity: Reports have documented rare cases of fulminant hepatitis in persons receiving efavirenz, progressing in some cases to hepatic failure that required liver transplantation, or resulted in death.[99,100,101] Efavirenz is not recommended for use in patients with hepatic insufficiency (Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B or C).
  • Neuropsychiatric: Efavirenz has significant potential neuropsychiatric side effects that limit its use. These neuropsychiatric side effects include nightmares, impaired concentration, hallucinations, irritability, depression, and risk of suicide.[102,103] Efavirenz should be avoided in persons with preexisting mental health conditions. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that higher plasma efavirenz levels correlate with central nervous system adverse effects (Figure 6).[104] Taking efavirenz with food significantly increases efavirenz plasma levels when compared with taking it without food and thus it is recommended to take efavirenz on a relatively empty stomach.
  • Rash: Clinical trials have demonstrated that approximately 15% of patients (range 10 to 25%) treated with efavirenz develop a rash (Figure 7), which is significantly higher than reported rates of rash with doravirine, etravirine, or rilpivirine.[93,105,106] The rash typically presents as a mild-to-moderate erythematous, maculopapular exanthem without systemic involvement, though severe reactions, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, have occurred.
  • Hypovitaminosis D: Efavirenz has also been noted in studies to interfere with vitamin D metabolism, causing low vitamin D levels (sometimes leading to severely low levels and associated alkaline phosphatase elevations).[107,108,109]

Etravirine

Etravirine is an NNRTI that is primarily used for treatment-experienced individuals who have resistance to another NNRTI. The most common side effect of etravirine is rash, which occurs in approximately 5 to 10% of persons (more commonly in women than men) and is typically mild-to-moderate in severity, with only about 2% of persons needing to discontinue etravirine because of rash.[110] There are rare reports (less than 0.1%) of severe rash, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrosis, erythema multiforme, and DRESS (drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome.

Rilpivirine

Rilpivirine is available alone, as part of several oral single-tablet regimens (rilpivirine-tenofovir DF-emtricitabine, rilpivirine-tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine, and dolutegravir-rilpivirine), and as a component of the long-acting injectable cabotegravir plus rilpivirine. Multiple studies comparing oral rilpivirine with efavirenz (each given with two NRTIs) have shown lower rates of drug discontinuation of rilpivirine due to fewer adverse effects than with efavirenz.[103,105,111]

  • Cardiac QTc Interval Prolongation: Studies performed with high-dose rilpivirine (3 to 12 times higher than the recommended dose) in volunteers without HIV demonstrated QTc prolongation (10.7 msec increase with a 75 mg daily dose and 23.3 msec with a 300 mg once-daily dose); it is recommended to consider using an alternative to rilpivirine in a patient receiving another medication that has known risk for causing torsades de pointes.[112]
  • Elevated Serum Creatinine: In several trials, rilpivirine caused mild elevations in serum creatinine related to inhibition of tubular secretion of creatinine, but this did not represent a true reduction in renal function, nor did it require discontinuation of rilpivirine.[111]
  • Neuropsychiatric: Rilpivirine has the potential to cause neuropsychiatric side effects, including depression, insomnia, headaches, and dizziness, but the risk is significantly lower than with efavirenz.[105,113]
  • Injection Site Reactions: With the long-acting injectable rilpivirine, which is given in combination with long-acting injectable cabotegravir, the major adverse effect has been injection site reactions; in clinical trials, most of these reactions were graded as mild to moderate, and the vast majority resolved within 7 days. The most frequent type of reaction was pain, followed much less frequently by nodules, induration, and swelling.[32]

Pharmacologic Boosters

General Considerations

Ritonavir and cobicistat are pharmacokinetic enhancers that boost the concentration of other antiretroviral agents used in the treatment of HIV. Both medications work by interacting with the hepatic metabolism of antiretroviral drugs through the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) system. As would be expected, both of these medications can significantly impact the levels of other coadministered medications that are metabolized via the cytochrome P450 system, potentially leading to clinically significant (and occasionally unpredictable) drug interactions and potential adverse effects.

Ritonavir

Ritonavir is a protease inhibitor (PI) that was previously used at high doses as an independent antiretroviral medication, but due to side effects it is no longer used as a PI. It inhibits the liver enzyme CYP450 3A (CYP3A) and now is used exclusively at lower doses for its boosting effect. The main symptoms associated with ritonavir consist of gastrointestinal effects, including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. These side effects are greater with higher doses of ritonavir.

Cobicistat

Cobicistat is also a CYP34A inhibitor and was developed specifically as a pharmacokinetic enhancer of atazanavir and darunavir; it is also available in combination form as a booster for elvitegravir. Cobicistat does not have any intrinsic activity against HIV. Cobicistat reduces tubular secretion of creatinine via competitive inhibitor of the multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 (MATE1).[114,115] In the kidney, MATE1 is located in the luminal (urine) membrane of renal tubular cells, and MATE1 can transport creatinine from the renal tubular cell into the renal tubule lumen. The inhibition of MATE1 by cobicistat causes reduced tubular secretion of creatinine and results in a benign increase in serum creatinine. This inhibition correlates with a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), but iohexol clearance studies have shown that cobicistat does not impact the actual glomerular filtration rate.[116] The rise in serum creatinine, which typically is about 0.10 to 0.15 mg/dL, occurs within the first 8 weeks of starting antiretroviral therapy and then stabilizes.[36,116] For patients taking cobicistat-containing regimens, changes in serum creatinine greater than 0.4 mg/mL from baseline may indicate another cause and should prompt an evaluation.[115] In clinical trials, cobicistat was also associated with gastrointestinal symptoms, primarily nausea and diarrhea.[115]

Protease Inhibitors

In modern clinical practice, when a protease inhibitor (PI) is used, it is usually darunavir (boosted with either cobicistat or ritonavir) and less often boosted atazanavir. The following discussion will not adress adverse effects of amprenavir, fosamprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir-ritonavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir, or tipranavir, since these PIs have either been discontinued or are rarely used in clinical practice.[2]

Adverse Effects Observed with More than One PI

Gastrointestinal Adverse Effects

Gastrointestinal side effects (mainly diarrhea but also nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain) were common with early PIs, particularly PIs given with high doses of ritonavir for pharmacokinetic boosting; these adverse effects are less frequent and less severe with more recently developed PIs and when lower doses of ritonavir are used for boosting (100 mg/day versus 200 mg/day).[1] In several trials, boosted darunavir and boosted atazanavir demonstrated lower rates of gastrointestinal side effects compared with the combination of lopinavir-ritonavir.[117,118,119] Nevertheless, PIs overall are linked to higher rates of gastrointestinal side effects than other drug classes, such as the INSTIs or NNRTIs, and even modern PIs can cause gastrointestinal intolerability.[120,121,122]

Cardiovascular Risk

Protease inhibitors have been associated with dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, premature atherosclerosis, and myocardial infarction.[123] The large, prospective, observational D:A:D study found that the incidence of myocardial infarction increased from 1.53 per 1000 person-years in those not exposed to PIs to 6.01 per 1000 person-years in those exposed to PIs for longer than 6 years, with much of this risk attributable to elevated lipid levels.[124] Boosted darunavir has a lower cardiovascular risk than older protease inhibitors. An analysis from the D:A:D trial found that cumulative use of ritonavir-boosted darunavir was associated with a modest, yet progressively increasing, risk of cardiovascular events.[125] In contrast, boosted atazanavir has a neutral or even beneficial effect on cardiovascular disease, presumably because it elevates bilirubin levels and bilirubin is a known antioxidant that favorably impacts the development of atherosclerosis.[126,127]

Cardiac Conduction Abnormalities

Several studies have revealed PR prolongation as a potential cardiac conduction complication of ritonavir-boosted PIs, including ritonavir-boosted atazanavir.[2,128] Accordingly, ritonavir-boosted PIs should be used with caution in persons who have underlying conduction defects or in patients taking other medications that can prolong the PR interval.

Atazanavir

Although atazanavir was a preferred first-line agent for many years, relatively lower potency and the potential disadvantage of hyperbilirubinemia (which causes cosmetic concern for many patients) have limited its use compared with newer antiretroviral therapy options.

  • Hyperbilirubinemia: Atazanavir can block the normal glucuronidation of bilirubin through inhibition of the liver enzyme uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1), an enzyme responsible for converting unconjugated bilirubin to conjugated bilirubin (Figure 9).[129] The inhibition of UGT1A1 by atazanavir causes an increase in indirect bilirubin and potentially jaundice, but it does not cause liver damage. The degree of hyperbilirubinemia typically fluctuates and will return to normal when atazanavir is discontinued.[2] .
  • Nephrolithiasis: Atazanavir-induced kidney stones develop in approximately 1% of persons taking ritonavir-boosted atazanavir.[130,131,132] The onset of nephrolithiasis occurs, on average, 2 years after starting atazanavir.[133] The urine sediment may show rod-shaped crystals, and the actual stones are often composed of atazanavir and/or calcium phosphate. Atazanavir stones are typically radiolucent and therefore not evident on plain film radiograph or non-contrast computed tomography (CT).[134] Crystal nephropathy can also occur in the absence of stones and should be suspected in persons with rising creatinine levels or sterile pyuria.
  • Cholelithiasis: Several reports have been published that suggest ritonavir-boosted atazanavir is associated with an approximately two-fold increased risk of developing cholelithiasis.[135,136,137] A separate study, however, failed to show an increased risk of cholelithiasis with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir when compared with other protease inhibitors.[131,132]

Darunavir

Although darunavir is no longer recommended as initial antiretroviral therapy for most individuals with HIV (unless an individual has received injectable cabotegravir for HIV PrEP prior to the diagnosis of HIV), it remains a cornerstone of second-line and salvage antiretroviral therapy. Abdominal pain and diarrhea are the most common darunavir-related symptoms, occurring in approximately 5 to 14% of persons.[119,138] The incidence of rash is approximately 10%, with most cases of mild severity.[119,138] The mild rash typically begins during the first 4 weeks of treatment and resolves even with the continuation of darunavir. Severe skin rash has been reported in less than 1% of persons taking darunavir, which can be accompanied by fever and/or increases in hepatic aminotransferase levels.[119,138] Darunavir should promptly be discontinued if a severe skin rash develops. Darunavir contains a sulfonamide moiety, and persons with a history of skin reaction to a sulfa medication have an increased risk of developing rash when taking darunavir. A history of sulfa allergy is not considered a darunavir contraindication, but darunavir should be used with caution in this situation, especially if the prior sulfa reaction was severe.

Capsid Inhibitors

Lenacapavir

The FDA has approved one agent in the capsid inhibitor class, lenacapavir, which is approved as part of antiretroviral therapy for heavily treatment-experienced individuals with multiclass drug resistance. The drug is administered as a subcutaneous injection every 6 months (along with a brief oral lead-in, given either as two days of oral pills starting on the same day as the first subcutaneous injection, or given as oral pills on days 1, 2, and 8, followed by an initial injection on day 15).[139] In clinical trials, the most common adverse effects of lenacapavir injections were nausea and injection site reactions; most injection site reactions were mild and did not necessitate discontinuation of the drug.[140] The most common types of injection site reactions were pain, swelling, erythema, nodule formation, and induration. The injection site erythema, swelling, and pain tend to lessen over a couple of days and usually respond to ice and other conservative measures. The subcutaneous nodules can be more persistent, sometimes lasting for months. Otherwise, the most common adverse effects were nausea (experienced by 13% of participants), constipation (experienced by 11%), and diarrhea (experienced by 11%); again, most side effects were mild and did not lead to discontinuation of the lenacapavir.

Summary Points

  • Fostemsavir is generally well tolerated but should be used with caution in individuals with QTc prolongation or risk factors for that condition. The other entry inhibitors, like maraviroc and ibalizumab, are also typically well tolerated, though ibalizumab requires regular infusions and does have a small risk of infusion reactions.
  • Bictegravir, dolutegravir, rilpivirine, and the pharmacokinetic enhancer cobicistat can increase serum creatinine and decrease estimated creatinine clearance by inhibiting the active tubular secretion of creatinine, but these drugs do not typically impact the actual glomerular filtration rate.
  • Dolutegravir can cause headaches and insomnia. Bictegravir and dolutegravir have been associated with greater weight gain than other classes of antiretrovirals.
  • Abacavir can cause hypersensitivity syndrome in persons who are HLA-B*5701 positive and use of this medication requires a baseline HLA-B*5701 screening test. Abacavir may also increase the risk of myocardial infarction compared with other NRTIs.
  • Tenofovir DF can cause nephrotoxicity, including progressive chronic kidney disease and Fanconi syndrome (generalized proximal tubule dysfunction), which manifests as proteinuria, type 2 renal tubular acidosis, and phosphate wasting. Tenofovir DF has also been linked to decreased bone density. Tenofovir alafenamide has significantly lower adverse renal and bone mineral density effects than tenofovir DF.
  • Efavirenz may cause significant neuropsychiatric side effects, including suicidality, and it is no longer a recommended antiretroviral for most individuals with HIV.
  • The most common side effects of darunavir (boosted with cobicistat or ritonavir) include gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting) and rash; the rash usually self-resolves and requires discontinuation of the drug in less than 1% of cases.
  • The most common complication of lenacapavir is injection site reactions, which typically are mild and resolve within a few days. Injection site reactions are also the most common adverse effect with long-acting, intramuscular cabotegravir and rilpivirine.
  PDF Share

Citations

  1. 1.Fernandez-Montero JV, Eugenia E, Barreiro P, Labarga P, Soriano V. Antiretroviral drug-related toxicities - clinical spectrum, prevention, and management. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2013;12:697-707.
  2. 2.Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Limitations to treatment safety and efficacy: adverse effects of antiretroviral agents. May 26, 2023.
    [HIV.gov] -
  3. 3.Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. What to Start. Initial Combination Antiretroviral Regimens for People With HIV. September 12, 2024.
    [HIV.gov] -
  4. 4.Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Laboratory testing: laboratory testing for initial assessment and monitoring of people with HIV. September 25, 2025.
    [HIV.gov] -
  5. 5.Cahn P, Fink V, Patterson P. Fostemsavir: a new CD4 attachment inhibitor. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2018;13:341-345.
  6. 6.Kozal M, Aberg J, Pialoux G, et al. Fostemsavir in Adults with Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 Infection. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1232-43.
  7. 7.Lagishetty C, Moore K, Ackerman P, Llamoso C, Magee M. Effects of Temsavir, Active Moiety of Antiretroviral Agent Fostemsavir, on QT Interval: Results From a Phase I Study and an Exposure-Response Analysis. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;13:769-776.
  8. 8.Emu B, Fessel J, Schrader S, et al. Phase 3 Study of Ibalizumab for Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:645-54.
  9. 9.Hardy WD, Gulick RM, Mayer H, et al. Two-year safety and virologic efficacy of maraviroc in treatment-experienced patients with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 infection: 96-week combined analysis of MOTIVATE 1 and 2. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55:558-64.
  10. 10.Sierra-Madero J, Di Perri G, Wood R, et al. Efficacy and safety of maraviroc versus efavirenz, both with zidovudine/lamivudine: 96-week results from the MERIT study. HIV Clin Trials. 2010;11:125-32.
  11. 11.Rockstroh JK, Plonski F, Bansal M, et al. Hepatic safety of maraviroc in patients with HIV-1 and hepatitis C and/or B virus: 144-week results from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Antivir Ther. 2017;22:263-269.
  12. 12.Wasmuth JC, Rockstroh JK, Hardy WD. Drug safety evaluation of maraviroc for the treatment of HIV infection. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2012;11:161-74.
  13. 13.Glass WG, McDermott DH, Lim JK, et al. CCR5 deficiency increases risk of symptomatic West Nile virus infection. J Exp Med. 2006;203:35-40.
  14. 14.Lim JK, McDermott DH, Lisco A, et al. CCR5 deficiency is a risk factor for early clinical manifestations of West Nile virus infection but not for viral transmission. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:178-85.
  15. 15.Harris M, Larsen G, Montaner JS. Exacerbation of depression associated with starting raltegravir: a report of four cases. AIDS. 2008;22:1890-2.
  16. 16.Kheloufi F, Allemand J, Mokhtari S, Default A. Psychiatric disorders after starting dolutegravir: report of four cases. AIDS. 2015;29:1723-5.
  17. 17.Bourgi K, Rebeiro PF, Turner M, et al. Greater Weight Gain in Treatment-naive Persons Starting Dolutegravir-based Antiretroviral Therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70:1267-74.
  18. 18.Bourgi K, Jenkins CA, Rebeiro PF, et al. Weight gain among treatment-naïve persons with HIV starting integrase inhibitors compared to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or protease inhibitors in a large observational cohort in the United States and Canada. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23:e25484.
  19. 19.Venter WDF, Moorhouse M, Sokhela S, et al. Dolutegravir plus Two Different Prodrugs of Tenofovir to Treat HIV. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:803-15.
  20. 20.Mallon PW, Brunet L, Hsu RK, et al. Weight gain before and after switch from TDF to TAF in a U.S. cohort study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021;24:e25702.
  21. 21.Sax PE, Erlandson KM, Lake JE, et al. Weight Gain Following Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy: Risk Factors in Randomized Comparative Clinical Trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:1379-89.
  22. 22.Koethe JR, Lake JE, Kantor A, et al. A 48-week, Randomized Controlled Trial of Doravirine for Individuals with HIV and Obesity on Integrase Inhibitors and Tenofovir Alafenamide: The Do IT Study (ACTG A5391). Clin Infect Dis. 2026 Mar 18:ciag196. Online ahead of print.
  23. 23.Wyatt CM. Antiretroviral therapy and the kidney. Top Antivir Med. 2014;22:655-8.
  24. 24.Gutierrez Mdel M, Mateo MG, Vidal F, Domingo P. Drug safety profile of integrase strand transfer inhibitors. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13:431-45.
  25. 25.Lucas GM, Ross MJ, Stock PG, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of chronic kidney disease in patients infected with HIV: 2014 update by the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:e96-138.
  26. 26.Wohl D, Clarke A, Maggiolo F, et al. Patient-Reported Symptoms Over 48 Weeks Among Participants in Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Non-inferiority Trials of Adults with HIV on Co-formulated Bictegravir, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide versus Co-formulated Abacavir, Dolutegravir, and Lamivudine. Patient. 2018;11:561-573.
  27. 27.Gallant J, Lazzarin A, Mills A, et al. Bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (GS-US-380-1489): a double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2063-72.
  28. 28.Daar ES, DeJesus E, Ruane P, et al. Efficacy and safety of switching to fixed-dose bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide from boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1: 48 week results of a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV. 2018;5:e347-e356.
  29. 29.Sax PE, Pozniak A, Montes ML, et al. Coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (GS-US-380-1490): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2073-82.
  30. 30.Landovitz RJ, Donnell D, Clement ME, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:595-608.
  31. 31.Orkin C, Arasteh K, Górgolas Hernández-Mora M, et al. Long-Acting Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine after Oral Induction for HIV-1 Infection. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1124-35.
  32. 32.Swindells S, Andrade-Villanueva JF, Richmond GJ, et al. Long-Acting Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine for Maintenance of HIV-1 Suppression. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1112-23.
  33. 33.Osterholzer DA, Goldman M. Dolutegravir: a next-generation integrase inhibitor for treatment of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:265-71.
  34. 34.Walmsley SL, Antela A, Clumeck N, et al. Dolutegravir plus abacavir-lamivudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1807-18.
  35. 35.Curtis L, Nichols G, Stainsby C, et al. Dolutegravir: clinical and laboratory safety in integrase inhibitor-naive patients. HIV Clin Trials. 2014;15:199-208.
  36. 36.Sax PE, DeJesus E, Mills A, et al. Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir versus co-formulated efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, analysis of results after 48 weeks. Lancet. 2012;379:2439-48.
  37. 37.DeJesus E, Rockstroh JK, Henry K, et al. Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus co-formulated emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379:2429-38.
  38. 38.Croce F, Vitello P, Dalla Pria A, Riva A, Galli M, Antinori S.  Severe raltegravir-associated rhabdomyolysis: a case report and review of the literature.  Int J STD AIDS. 2010;21:783-5.
  39. 39.Lee FJ, Amin J, Bloch M, Pett SL, Marriott D, Carr A. Skeletal muscle toxicity associated with raltegravir-based combination antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62:525-33.
  40. 40.Thomas M, Hopkins C, Duffy E, et al. Association of the HLA-B*53:01 Allele With Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome During Treatment of HIV Infection With Raltegravir. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1198-1203.
  41. 41.Ripamonti D, Benatti SV, Di Filippo E, Ravasio V, Rizzi M. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms associated with raltegravir use: case report and review of the literature. AIDS. 2014;28:1077-9.
  42. 42.Loulergue P, Mir O. Raltegravir-induced DRESS syndrome. Scand J Infect Dis. 2012;44:802-3.
  43. 43.Schambelan M, Benson CA, Carr A, et al. Management of metabolic complications associated with antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection: recommendations of an International AIDS Society-USA panel. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;31:257-75.
  44. 44.Côté HC, Brumme ZL, Craib KJ, et al. Changes in mitochondrial DNA as a marker of nucleoside toxicity in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:811-20.
  45. 45.Carr A, Workman C, Smith DE, et al. Abacavir substitution for nucleoside analogs in patients with HIV lipoatrophy: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2002;288:207-15.
  46. 46.James J, Carruthers A, Carruthers J. HIV-associated facial lipoatrophy. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28:979-86.
  47. 47.Feeney ER, Mallon PW. HIV and HAART-Associated Dyslipidemia. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2011;5:49-63.
  48. 48.Tungsiripat M, Kitch D, Glesby MJ, et al. A pilot study to determine the impact on dyslipidemia of adding tenofovir to stable background antiretroviral therapy: ACTG 5206. AIDS. 2010;24:1781-4.
  49. 49.Domingo P, Labarga P, Palacios R, et al. Improvement of dyslipidemia in patients switching from stavudine to tenofovir: preliminary results. AIDS. 2004;18:1475-8.
  50. 50.Tebas P, Sension M, Arribas J, et al. Lipid levels and changes in body fat distribution in treatment-naive, HIV-1-Infected adults treated with rilpivirine or Efavirenz for 96 weeks in the ECHO and THRIVE trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:425-34.
  51. 51.Strategies for Management of Anti-Retroviral Therapy/INSIGHT1; DAD Study Groups. Use of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and risk of myocardial infarction in HIV-infected patients. AIDS. 2008;22:F17-24.
  52. 52.Obel N, Farkas DK, Kronborg G, et al. Abacavir and risk of myocardial infarction in HIV-infected patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy: a population-based nationwide cohort study. HIV Med. 2010;11:130-6.
  53. 53.Choi AI, Vittinghoff E, Deeks SG, Weekley CC, Li Y, Shlipak MG. Cardiovascular risks associated with abacavir and tenofovir exposure in HIV-infected persons. AIDS. 2011;25:1289-98.
  54. 54.Cruciani M, Zanichelli V, Serpelloni G, et al. Abacavir use and cardiovascular disease events: a meta-analysis of published and unpublished data. AIDS. 2011;25:1993-2004.
  55. 55.Worm SW, Sabin C, Weber R, et al. Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with HIV infection exposed to specific individual antiretroviral drugs from the 3 major drug classes: the data collection on adverse events of anti-HIV drugs (D:A:D) study. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:318-30.
  56. 56.Sabin CA, Worm SW, Weber R, et al. Use of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and risk of myocardial infarction in HIV-infected patients enrolled in the D:A:D study: a multi-cohort collaboration. Lancet. 2008;371:1417-26.
  57. 57.Baum PD, Sullam PM, Stoddart CA, McCune JM. Abacavir increases platelet reactivity via competitive inhibition of soluble guanylyl cyclase. AIDS. 2011;25:2243-8.
  58. 58.Satchell CS, O'Halloran JA, Cotter AG, et al. Increased platelet reactivity in HIV-1-infected patients receiving abacavir-containing antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:1202-10.
  59. 59.Trevillyan JM, Arthur JF, Jing J, Andrews RK, Gardiner EE, Hoy JF. Effects of abacavir administration on structural and functional markers of platelet activation. AIDS. 2015;29:2309-13.
  60. 60.Hewitt RG. Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:1137-42.
  61. 61.Martin MA, Kroetz DL. Abacavir pharmacogenetics--from initial reports to standard of care. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33:765-75.
  62. 62.Hughes CA, Foisy MM, Dewhurst N, Higgins N, Robinson L, Kelly DV, Lechelt KE. Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction: an update. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42:387-96.
  63. 63.Kumar PN, Patel P. Lamivudine for the treatment of HIV. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2010;6:105-14.
  64. 64.Modrzejewski KA, Herman RA. Emtricitabine: a once-daily nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:1006-14.
  65. 65.Saag MS. Emtricitabine, a new antiretroviral agent with activity against HIV and hepatitis B virus. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:126-31.
  66. 66.Skin discoloration with FTC. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2004;18:616.
  67. 67.Williams V, Cory TJ. Doravirine/islatravir for the treatment of HIV. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2025;26:9-15.
  68. 68.Colson AE, Mills AM, Ramgopal MN, et al. Switch to fixed-dose doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·25 mg) once daily in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 on bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide: 48-week results of a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2026;407:611-21.
  69. 69.Orkin C, Mngqibisa R, Velez JD, et al. Switch to fixed-dose doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·25 mg) once daily in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 on oral antiretroviral therapy: 48-week results of a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2026;407:599-610.
  70. 70.Rockstroh JK, Kassim S, Paredes R, et al. Fixed-dose daily doravirine (100 mg) with islatravir (0·25 mg) versus bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide for initial HIV-1 therapy: 48-week results of a phase 3, randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV. 2026 Feb 25. Online ahead of print.
  71. 71.Lee WA, He GX, Eisenberg E, et al. Selective intracellular activation of a novel prodrug of the human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir leads to preferential distribution and accumulation in lymphatic tissue. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:1898-906.
  72. 72.Birkus G, Wang R, Liu X, et al. Cathepsin A is the major hydrolase catalyzing the intracellular hydrolysis of the antiretroviral nucleotide phosphonoamidate prodrugs GS-7340 and GS-9131. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:543-50.
  73. 73.Babusis D, Phan TK, Lee WA, Watkins WJ, Ray AS. Mechanism for effective lymphoid cell and tissue loading following oral administration of nucleotide prodrug GS-7340. Mol Pharm. 2013;10:459-66.
  74. 74.Sax PE, Wohl D, Yin MT, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, coformulated with elvitegravir, cobicistat, and emtricitabine, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: two randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trials. Lancet. 2015;385:2606-15.
  75. 75.Gallant JE, Daar ES, Raffi F, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate given as fixed-dose combinations containing emtricitabine as backbones for treatment of HIV-1 infection in virologically suppressed adults: a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet HIV. 2016:e158-65.
  76. 76.Pozniak A, Arribas JR, Gathe J, et al. Switching to Tenofovir Alafenamide, Coformulated With Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, and Emtricitabine, in HIV-Infected Patients With Renal Impairment: 48-Week Results From a Single-Arm, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 3 Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;71:530-7.
  77. 77.Sax PE, Zolopa A, Brar I, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in single tablet regimens for initial HIV-1 therapy: a randomized phase 2 study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;67:52-8.
  78. 78.Gomez M, Seybold U, Roider J, Härter G, Bogner JR. A retrospective analysis of weight changes in HIV-positive patients switching from a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)- to a tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF)-containing treatment regimen in one German university hospital in 2015-2017. Infection. 2019;47:95-102.
  79. 79.Moyle GJ, Orkin C, Fisher M, et al. A randomized comparative trial of continued abacavir/lamivudine plus efavirenz or replacement with efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF in hypercholesterolemic HIV-1 infected individuals. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116297.
  80. 80.Scherzer R, Estrella M, Li Y, et al. Association of tenofovir exposure with kidney disease risk in HIV infection. AIDS. 2012;26:867-75.
  81. 81.Shah S, Pilkington V, Hill A. Is tenofovir disoproxil fumarate associated with weight loss? AIDS. 2021;35:S189-S195.
  82. 82.McComsey GA, Kitch D, Daar ES, et al. Bone mineral density and fractures in antiretroviral-naive persons randomized to receive abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine along with efavirenz or atazanavir-ritonavir: Aids Clinical Trials Group A5224s, a substudy of ACTG A5202. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:1791-801.
  83. 83.McComsey GA, Tebas P, Shane E, et al. Bone disease in HIV infection: a practical review and recommendations for HIV care providers. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:937-46.
  84. 84.Llamas-Granda P, Martin-Rodríguez L, Largo R, Herrero-Beaumont G, Mediero A. Tenofovir Modulates Semaphorin 4D Signaling and Regulates Bone Homeostasis, Which Can Be Counteracted by Dipyridamole and Adenosine A2A Receptor. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22: 11490.
  85. 85.Van Welzen BJ, Thielen MAJ, Mudrikova T, Arends JE, Hoepelman AIM. Switching tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide results in a significant decline in parathyroid hormone levels: uncovering the mechanism of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-related bone loss? AIDS. 2019;33:1531-4.
  86. 86.Cohen SD, Chawla LS, Kimmel PL. Acute kidney injury in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14:647-53.
  87. 87.Rodríguez-Nóvoa S, Labarga P, Soriano V, et al. Predictors of kidney tubular dysfunction in HIV-infected patients treated with tenofovir: a pharmacogenetic study. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:e108-16.
  88. 88.Yoshino M, Yagura H, Kushida H, et al. Assessing recovery of renal function after tenofovir disoproxil fumarate discontinuation. J Infect Chemother. 2012;18:169-74.
  89. 89.Gallant JE, DeJesus E, Arribas JR, et al. Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:251-60.
  90. 90.Scruggs ER, Dirks Naylor AJ. Mechanisms of zidovudine-induced mitochondrial toxicity and myopathy. Pharmacology. 2008;82:83-8.
  91. 91.Colombier MA, Molina JM. Doravirine: a review. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2018;13:308-314.
  92. 92.Deeks ED. Doravirine: First Global Approval. Drugs. 2018;78:1643-1650.
  93. 93.Orkin C, Squires KE, Molina JM, et al. Doravirine/Lamivudine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate is Non-inferior to Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Treatment-naive Adults With Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Infection: Week 48 Results of the DRIVE-AHEAD Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68:535-44.
  94. 94.Castillo R, Pedalino RP, El-Sherif N, Turitto G. Efavirenz-associated QT prolongation and Torsade de Pointes arrhythmia. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36:1006-8.
  95. 95.Abdelhady AM, Shugg T, Thong N, et al. Efavirenz Inhibits the Human Ether-A-Go-Go Related Current (hERG) and Induces QT Interval Prolongation in CYP2B6*6*6 Allele Carriers. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:1206-1213.
  96. 96.Crane HM, Grunfeld C, Willig JH, et al. Impact of NRTIs on lipid levels among a large HIV-infected cohort initiating antiretroviral therapy in clinical care. AIDS. 2011;25:185-95.
  97. 97.Gotti D, Cesana BM, Albini L, et al. Increase in standard cholesterol and large HDL particle subclasses in antiretroviral-naïve patients prescribed efavirenz compared to atazanavir/ritonavir. HIV Clin Trials. 2012;13:245-55.
  98. 98.Durand M, Sheehy O, Baril JG, Lelorier J, Tremblay CL. Association between HIV infection, antiretroviral therapy, and risk of acute myocardial infarction: a cohort and nested case-control study using Québec's public health insurance database. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;57:245-53.
  99. 99.Echenique IA, Rich JD. EFV/FTC/TDF-associated hepatotoxicity: a case report and review. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2013;27:493-7.
  100. 100.Manosuthi W, Sukasem C, Lueangniyomkul A, et al. CYP2B6 haplotype and biological factors responsible for hepatotoxicity in HIV-infected patients receiving efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014;43:292-6.
  101. 101.Patil R, Ona MA, Papafragkakis H, et al. Acute Liver Toxicity due to Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir. Case Reports Hepatol. 2015;2015:280353.
  102. 102.Arendt G, de Nocker D, von Giesen HJ, Nolting T. Neuropsychiatric side effects of efavirenz therapy. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2007;6:147-54.
  103. 103.Mollan KR, Smurzynski M, Eron JJ, et al. Association between efavirenz as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection and increased risk for suicidal ideation or attempted or completed suicide: an analysis of trial data. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:1-10.
  104. 104.Marzolini C, Telenti A, Decosterd LA, Greub G, Biollaz J, Buclin T. Efavirenz plasma levels can predict treatment failure and central nervous system side effects in HIV-1-infected patients. AIDS. 2001;15:71-5.
  105. 105.van Lunzen J, Antinori A, Cohen CJ, et al. Rilpivirine vs. efavirenz-based single-tablet regimens in treatment-naive adults: week 96 efficacy and safety from a randomized phase 3b study. AIDS. 2016;30:251-9.
  106. 106.Behrens G, Rijnders B, Nelson M, et al. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients with HIV-1 RNA ≤100,000 copies/mL: week 96 pooled ECHO/THRIVE subanalysis. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2014;28:168-75.
  107. 107.Welz T, Childs K, Ibrahim F, et al. Efavirenz is associated with severe vitamin D deficiency and increased alkaline phosphatase. AIDS. 2010;24:1923-8.
  108. 108.Nylén H, Habtewold A, Makonnen E, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment-associated severe vitamin D deficiency: A prospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e4631.
  109. 109.Brown TT, McComsey GA. Association between initiation of antiretroviral therapy with efavirenz and decreases in 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Antivir Ther. 2010;15:425-9.
  110. 110.Girard PM, Campbell TB, Grinsztejn B, et al. Pooled week 96 results of the phase III DUET-1 and DUET-2 trials of etravirine: further analysis of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities of special interest. HIV Med. 2012;13:427-35.
  111. 111.Cohen CJ, Andrade-Villanueva J, Clotet B, et al. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with two background nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011;378:229-37.
  112. 112.Deeks ED. Emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate single-tablet regimen: a review of its use in HIV infection. Drugs. 2014;74:2079-95.
  113. 113.Mills AM, Antinori A, Clotet B, et al. Neurological and psychiatric tolerability of rilpivirine (TMC278) vs. efavirenz in treatment-naïve, HIV-1-infected patients at 48 weeks. HIV Med. 2013;14:391-400.
  114. 114.Stray KM, Bam RA, Birkus G, et al. Evaluation of the effect of cobicistat on the in vitro renal transport and cytotoxicity potential of tenofovir. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:4982-9.
  115. 115.Sherman EM, Worley MV, Unger NR, Gauthier TP, Schafer JJ. Cobicistat: Review of a Pharmacokinetic Enhancer for HIV Infection. Clin Ther. 2015;37:1876-93.
  116. 116.German P, Liu HC, Szwarcberg J, et al. Effect of cobicistat on glomerular filtration rate in subjects with normal and impaired renal function. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;61:32-40.
  117. 117.Molina JM, Andrade-Villanueva J, Echevarria J, et al. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 48 week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. Lancet. 2008;372(9639):646-55.
  118. 118.Molina JM, Andrade-Villanueva J, Echevarria J, et al. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir compared with twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53:323-32.
  119. 119.Madruga JV, Berger D, McMurchie M, et al. Efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir compared with that of lopinavir-ritonavir at 48 weeks in treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients in TITAN: a randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet. 2007;370:49-58.
  120. 120.Eron JJ, Young B, Cooper DA, et al. Switch to a raltegravir-based regimen versus continuation of a lopinavir-ritonavir based regimen in stable HIV-infected patients with suppressed viraemia (SWITCHMRK 1 and 2): two multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled trials. Lancet 2010; 375:396-407.
  121. 121.Molina JM, Clotet B, van Lunzen J, et al. Once-daily dolutegravir is superior to once-daily darunavir/ritonavir in treatment-naïve HIV-1-positive individuals: 96 week results from FLAMINGO. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19490.
  122. 122.Molina JM, Clumeck N, Orkin C, Rimsky LT, Vanveggel S, Stevens M. Week 96 analysis of rilpivirine or efavirenz in HIV-1-infected patients with baseline viral load ≤ 100 000 copies/mL in the pooled ECHO and THRIVE phase 3, randomized, double-blind trials. HIV Med. 2014;15:57-62.
  123. 123.Zhou H, Pandak WM Jr, Lyall V, Natarajan R, Hylemon PB. HIV protease inhibitors activate the unfolded protein response in macrophages: implication for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;68:690-700.
  124. 124.Friis-Møller N, Worm SW. Can the risk of cardiovascular disease in HIV-infected patients be estimated from conventional risk prediction tools? Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1082-4.
  125. 125.Ryom L, Lundgren JD, El-Sadr W, et al. Cardiovascular disease and use of contemporary protease inhibitors: the D:A:D international prospective multicohort study. Lancet HIV. 2018;5:e291-e300.
  126. 126.Chow D, Shikuma C, Ritchings C, Guo M, Rosenblatt L. Atazanavir and Cardiovascular Risk Among Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review. Infect Dis Ther. 2016;5:473-89.
  127. 127.Li M, Chan WW, Zucker SD. Association Between Atazanavir-Induced Hyperbilirubinemia and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients Infected with HIV. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e016310.
  128. 128.Soliman EZ, Lundgren JD, Roediger MP, et al. Boosted protease inhibitors and the electrocardiographic measures of QT and PR durations. AIDS. 2011;25:367-77.
  129. 129.Zhang D, Chando TJ, Everett DW, Patten CJ, Dehal SS, Humphreys WG. In vitro inhibition of UDP glucuronosyltransferases by atazanavir and other HIV protease inhibitors and the relationship of this property to in vivo bilirubin glucuronidation. Drug Metab Dispos. 2005;33:1729-39.
  130. 130.Couzigou C, Daudon M, Meynard JL, et al. Urolithiasis in HIV-positive patients treated with atazanavir. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:e105-8.
  131. 131.Hamada Y, Nishijima T, Komatsu H, et al. Is ritonavir-boosted atazanavir a risk for cholelithiasis compared to other protease inhibitors? PLoS One. 2013;8:e69845.
  132. 132.Hamada Y, Nishijima T, Watanabe K, et al. High incidence of renal stones among HIV-infected patients on ritonavir-boosted atazanavir than in those receiving other protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:1262-9.
  133. 133.Hara M, Suganuma A, Yanagisawa N, Imamura A, Hishima T, Ando M. Atazanavir nephrotoxicity. Clin Kidney J. 2015;8:137-42.
  134. 134.Gentle DL, Stoller ML, Jarrett TW, Ward JF, Geib KS, Wood AF. Protease inhibitor-induced urolithiasis. Urology. 1997;50:508-511.
  135. 135.Rakotondravelo S, Poinsignon Y, Borsa-Lebas F, et al. Complicated atazanavir-associated cholelithiasis: a report of 14 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:1270-2.
  136. 136.Nishijima T, Shimbo T, Komatsu H, et al. Cumulative exposure to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir is associated with cholelithiasis in patients with HIV-1 infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:1385-9.
  137. 137.Nishijima T, Yazaki H, Hinoshita F, et al. Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis mimicking acute tubular necrosis after initiation of tenofovir-containing antiretroviral therapy in patient with HIV-1 infection. Intern Med. 2012;51:2469-71.
  138. 138.Ortiz R, Dejesus E, Khanlou H, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients at week 48. AIDS. 2008;22:1389-97.
  139. 139.Mushtaq A, Kazi F. Lenacapavir: a new treatment of resistant HIV-1 infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23:286.
  140. 140.Segal-Maurer S, DeJesus E, Stellbrink HJ, et al. Capsid Inhibition with Lenacapavir in Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 Infection. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1793-1803.

Additional References

  • Ayoub A, Alston S, Goodrich J, et al. Hepatic safety and tolerability in the maraviroc clinical development program. AIDS. 2010;24:2743-50.
  • Bakal DR, Coelho LE, Luz PM, et al. Obesity following ART initiation is common and influenced by both traditional and HIV-/ART-specific risk factors. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:2177-2185.
  • Brown TT, Glesby MJ. Management of the metabolic effects of HIV and HIV drugs. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;8:11-21.
  • Chan-Tack KM, Struble KA, Birnkrant DB. Intracranial hemorrhage and liver-associated deaths associated with tipranavir/ritonavir: review of cases from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2008;22:843-50.
  • Cohen CJ, Molina JM, Cassetti I, et al. Week 96 efficacy and safety of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1 patients in two Phase III randomized trials. AIDS. 2013;27:939-50.
  • D'Abbraccio M, Busto A, De Marco M, Figoni M, Maddaloni A, Abrescia N. Efficacy and Tolerability of Integrase Inhibitors in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. AIDS Rev. 2015;17:171-85.
  • Ford N, Mofenson L, Shubber Z, et al. Safety of efavirenz in the first trimester of pregnancy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2014;28 Suppl 2:S123-31.
  • Griesel R, Maartens G, Chirehwa M, et al. CYP2B6 Genotype and Weight Gain Differences Between Dolutegravir and Efavirenz. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73:e3902-e3909.
  • Lake JE, Trevillyan J. Impact of Integrase inhibitors and tenofovir alafenamide on weight gain in people with HIV. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2021;16:148-151.
  • Menard A, Meddeb L, Tissot-Dupont H, et al. Dolutegravir and weight gain: an unexpected bothering side effect? AIDS. 2017;31:1499-1500.
  • Molina JM, Squires K, Sax PE, et al. Doravirine versus ritonavir-boosted darunavir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 (DRIVE-FORWARD): 48-week results of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV. 2018;5:e211-e220.
  • Norwood J, Turner M, Bofill C, et al. Brief Report: Weight Gain in Persons With HIV Switched From Efavirenz-Based to Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor-Based Regimens. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;76:527-31.
  • Poeta J, Linden R, Antunes MV, et al. Plasma concentrations of efavirenz are associated with body weight in HIV-positive individuals. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:2601-4.
  • Rockwood N, Mandalia S, Bower M, Gazzard B, Nelson M.  Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir exposure is associated with an increased rate of renal stones compared with efavirenz, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and ritonavir-boosted darunavir. AIDS. 2011;25:1671-3.
  • Ryom L, Mocroft A, Kirk O, et al. Association between antiretroviral exposure and renal impairment among HIV-positive persons with normal baseline renal function: the D:A:D study. J Infect Dis. 2013;207:1359-69.
  • Sabin CA, Reiss P, Ryom L, et al. Is there continued evidence for an association between abacavir usage and myocardial infarction risk in individuals with HIV? A cohort collaboration. BMC Med. 2016;14:61.

Figures

This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from 1,152 persons following their initiation of antiretroviral therapy. This included 351 persons receiving an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (135 on dolutegravir, 153 on elvitegravir, and 63 on raltegravir).
Figure 1 (Image Series). Dolutegravir-Associated Weight Gain
This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from 1,152 persons following their initiation of antiretroviral therapy. This included 351 persons receiving an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (135 on dolutegravir, 153 on elvitegravir, and 63 on raltegravir).
Source: Bourgi K, Rebeiro PF, Turner M, et al. Greater Weight Gain in Treatment-naive Persons Starting Dolutegravir-based Antiretroviral Therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70:1267-74.
These data from the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD) show the greatest weight gain at years 1 and 2 with regimens containing dolutegravir (when compared to those with raltegravir or elvitegravir)
Figure 1B. Weight Gain in NA-ACCORD Study by INSTI-Based Regimen
These data from the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD) show the greatest weight gain at years 1 and 2 with regimens containing dolutegravir (when compared to those with raltegravir or elvitegravir)
Source: Bourgi K, Jenkins CA, Rebeiro PF, et al. Weight gain among treatment-naïve persons with HIV starting integrase inhibitors compared to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or protease inhibitors in a large observational cohort in the United States and Canada. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23:e25484.
<p>This graph shows weight gain at week 48 after starting antiretroviral therapy, based on the regimen used. The combination of dolutegravir with tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine was associated with the most weight gain.<br /> Abbreviations: DTG = dolutegravir; EFV = efavirenz; TDF = tenofovir DF; TAF = tenofovir alafenamide; FTC = emtricitabine</p>
Figure 1C. Impact of NRTI on Dolutegravir-Related Weight Gain

This graph shows weight gain at week 48 after starting antiretroviral therapy, based on the regimen used. The combination of dolutegravir with tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine was associated with the most weight gain.
Abbreviations: DTG = dolutegravir; EFV = efavirenz; TDF = tenofovir DF; TAF = tenofovir alafenamide; FTC = emtricitabine

Source: Venter WDF, Moorhouse M, Sokhela S, et al. Dolutegravir plus Two Different Prodrugs of Tenofovir to Treat HIV. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:803-15
Approximately 15% of creatinine is actively secreted into the urine by the proximal tubule. Dolutegravir can inhibit the urine organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2), a protein involved in renal tubular secretion of creatinine.
Figure 2 (Image Series). Inhibition of Tubular Secretion of Creatinine
Approximately 15% of creatinine is actively secreted into the urine by the proximal tubule. Dolutegravir can inhibit the urine organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2), a protein involved in renal tubular secretion of creatinine.
Illustration by Casandra Mack and David H. Spach, MD
Organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2 is a protein involved in renal tubular secretion of creatinine. The OCT2 transporter protein is located on the basolateral (blood) membrane of the renal tubular cell.
Figure 2B. Organic Cation Transporter 2 (OCT2) and Normal Tubular Secretion of Creatinine
Organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2 is a protein involved in renal tubular secretion of creatinine. The OCT2 transporter protein is located on the basolateral (blood) membrane of the renal tubular cell.
Illustration: David H. Spach, MD
Bictegravir and dolutegravir can inhibit OCT2, which blocks the secretion of creatinine from the basolateral membrane of the peritubular capillary blood cell into the renal tubular cell. As a result, more serum creatinine remains in the blood and serum creatinine increases.
Figure 2C. Inhibition of Tubular Secretion of Creatinine by Bictegravir and Dolutegravir
Bictegravir and dolutegravir can inhibit OCT2, which blocks the secretion of creatinine from the basolateral membrane of the peritubular capillary blood cell into the renal tubular cell. As a result, more serum creatinine remains in the blood and serum creatinine increases.
Illustration: David H. Spach, MD
This graph shows the mean change in serum creatinine levels from baseline for two antireretroviral regimens: dolutegravir plus abacavir-lamivudine and efavirenz-tenofovir DF-emtricitabine. The I bars indicate 1 standard deviation. To convert the values for creatinine to milligrams per deciliter, divide by 88.4.
Figure 3. Dolutegravir-Related Changes in Serum Creatinine Level
This graph shows the mean change in serum creatinine levels from baseline for two antireretroviral regimens: dolutegravir plus abacavir-lamivudine and efavirenz-tenofovir DF-emtricitabine. The I bars indicate 1 standard deviation. To convert the values for creatinine to milligrams per deciliter, divide by 88.4.
Source: Walmsley SL, Antela A, Clumeck N, et al. Dolutegravir plus abacavir-lamivudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1807-18. ©2013 Massachusetts Medical Society. Reprinted with permission from Massachusetts Medical Society.
A 25 mg dose of tenofovir alafenamide has 90% lower circulating plasma tenofovir levels when compared with a 300 mg dose of tenofovir DF.
Figure 4. Metabolism of Tenofovir DF and Tenofovir Alafenamide Cellular Activation
A 25 mg dose of tenofovir alafenamide has 90% lower circulating plasma tenofovir levels when compared with a 300 mg dose of tenofovir DF.
Illustration: David H. Spach, MD
Additional nonspecific indicators include proteinuria/albuminuria and hematuria. Investigational markers with limited clinical availability include aminoaciduria, urinary alfa-1 microglobulin, urinary beta-2 microglobulin, urinary retinol-binding protein, urinary cytochrome C, and urinary cystatin C.
Figure 5. Common Laboratory Indicators of Proximal Tubule Dysfunction
Additional nonspecific indicators include proteinuria/albuminuria and hematuria. Investigational markers with limited clinical availability include aminoaciduria, urinary alfa-1 microglobulin, urinary beta-2 microglobulin, urinary retinol-binding protein, urinary cytochrome C, and urinary cystatin C.
Source: modified from Lucas GM, Ross MJ, Stock PG, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of chronic kidney disease in patients infected with HIV: 2014 update by the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:e96-138.
This study involved an analysis of 130 adults taking an efavirenz-based antiretroviral regimen. Blood samples for efavirenz levels were drawn at an average of 14 hours after efavirenz intake.
Figure 6. Central Nervous System Toxicity Related to Plasma Efavirenz Levels
This study involved an analysis of 130 adults taking an efavirenz-based antiretroviral regimen. Blood samples for efavirenz levels were drawn at an average of 14 hours after efavirenz intake.
Source: Marzolini C, Telenti A, Decosterd LA, Greub G, Biollaz J, Buclin T. Efavirenz plasma levels can predict treatment failure and central nervous system side effects in HIV-1-infected patients. AIDS. 2001;15:71-5.
Figure 7. Efavirenz-Associated Rash
Photograph by David H. Spach, MD
Figure 8. Nevirapine-Associated Rash
Photograph by David H. Spach, MD
Abbreviation: UGT1A1 = uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A
Figure 9. Mechanism for Atazanavir-Associated Increase in Serum Bilirubin
Abbreviation: UGT1A1 = uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A
Illustration: David Spach, MD

Tables

Table 1. Laboratory Monitoring in Adults with HIV Taking Antiretroviral Therapy*
Laboratory Study ART Initiation 4-8 Weeks after ART Initiation or Modification Every
3 Months		 Every
6 Months		 Every
12 Months		 Clinically Indicated
HLA-B*5701 √
If considering abacavir		          
Basic metabolic panela,b √ √   √   √
ALT, AST, total bilirubin √ √   √   √
CBC with differentialc √   √
When monitoring CD4 count		 √
When monitoring CD4 count		 √
When no longer monitoring CD4 count 		 √
Lipid profiled √ Consider 1–3 months after ARV initiation or modification     √
If normal at baseline but with CV risk		 If normal at baseline, every 5 years or if clinically indicated
Random or fasting glucosee √         √
Urinalysisf,g √       √
​If on tenofovir DF or tenofovir alafenamide

√

E.g., in patients with chronic kidney disease or diabetes mellitus
Pregnancy testh √         √

*The information contained in this table is based on information in the table Laboratory Testing for Initial Assessment and Monitoring of People with HIV Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy.
aSerum Na, K, HCO3, Cl, BUN, creatinine, glucose, and Cr-based eGFR. Serum P should be monitored in patients with CKD who are on TDF-containing regimens.
bMore frequent monitoring may be indicated for patients with evidence of kidney disease (e.g., proteinuria, decreased glomerular dysfunction) or increased risk of renal insufficiency (e.g., patients with diabetes, hypertension).
cCBC with differential should be done when a CD4 count is performed. When CD4 count is no longer being monitored, the recommended frequency of CBC with differential is once a year. More frequent monitoring may be indicated for people receiving medications that potentially cause cytopenia (e.g., TMP-SMX).
dIf random lipids are abnormal, fasting lipids should be obtained. Consult the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association’s 2018 Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol for diagnosis and management of patients with dyslipidemia.
eIf random glucose is abnormal, fasting glucose should be obtained. HbA1C is no longer recommended for diagnosis of diabetes in people with HIV on ART.
fConsult the HIVMA/IDSA’s Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients Infected with HIV for recommendations on managing patients with renal disease. More frequent monitoring may be indicated for patients with evidence of kidney disease (e.g., proteinuria, decreased glomerular dysfunction) or increased risk of renal insufficiency (e.g., patients with diabetes, hypertension).
gUrine glucose and protein should be assessed before initiating tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)- or tenofovir DF (TDF)-containing regimens and monitored during treatment with these regimens.
hFor women of childbearing potential.
Source:
  • Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Laboratory testing: laboratory testing for initial assessment and monitoring of people with HIV. September 25, 2025. [HIV.gov]
Table 2. Allele Frequency of HLA-B*5701 in Various Population Groups
Population Group HLA-B*5701 Carrier Frequency Range (%)
European  1.4 – 10.2
South American 1.1– 3.1
African 0.0 – 3.2
Middle Eastern 0.5– 6.0
Mexican 0.0 – 4.0
Asian 0.0 – 6.7
Southwest Asian (Indian) 3.8 – 19.6
Source:
  • Martin MA, Kroetz DL. Abacavir pharmacogenetics--from initial reports to standard of care. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33:765-75. [PubMed Abstract]

Share by e-mail

Check
-On-
Learning
Questions
The Check-on-Learning Questions are short and topic related. They are meant to help you stay on track throughout each lesson and check your understanding of key concepts.

You must be signed in to customize your interaction with these questions.

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provided financial support for this website. The award provided 100% of total costs and totaled $1,175,136. The contents are those of the author. They may not reflect the policies of HRSA, HHS, or the U.S. Government.

Since you've received 80% or better on this quiz, you may claim continuing education credit.

You seem to have a popup blocker enabled. If you want to skip this dialog please Always allow popup windows for the online course.